Hi
I used Lame 3.70. With default 128kbps the quality is good enough for me. OK I
am as good as Aurangjeb as far as music is converned.
Also Lame documentation mentions that avrage bit rate is better in terms for
encoding time etc. Check out.
In my opinion, after you produce the first .mp3, I doubt you will opt for
experimenting with the bit rates. It's good anyway... :-))
Bye
Shridhar
Vinu Moses wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use lame (3.87 beta) to encode my mp3's. Documentation accompanying it
> mentions constant, average and variable bit rate encoding. Which is
> better: average or variable bit rate encoding?
>
> And which of the following would give me higher quality?
>
> lame -b 128 --abr 128
> (or)
> lame -b 128 -v
----------------------------------------------
An alpha version of a web based tool to manage
your subscription with this mailing list is at
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr
