[vinu@shoopy cdwriter]# lame test.wav LAME version 3.87 (beta 1, Nov 5 2000) (http://www.mp3dev.org) Using polyphase lowpass filter, transition band: 15115 Hz - 15648 Hz Encoding test.wav to test.wav.mp3 Encoding as 44.1 kHz 128 kbps j-stereo MPEG-1 LayerIII (11.0x) qval=5 Frame | CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU | ETA 13038/13038 (100%)| 2:16/ 2:16| 2:18/ 2:18| 2.4917x| 0:00 [vinu@shoopy cdwriter]# ls -lh test.wav test.wav.mp3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 57M Dec 14 19:40 test.wav -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5.2M Dec 14 19:43 test.wav.mp3 [vinu@shoopy cdwriter]# file test.wav test.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, stereo 44100 Hz And that's using an intel PII-400, 64Mb ram and linux 2.2.16-3. Regards, Vinu. Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > Can anybody post lame benchmark for CPU in common use? Because what I saw > yesterday was absolutely fast and I refuse to believe in them. > > For a 10000 frame song, approximately 3MB. > > 1)Intel PIII-550/256MB @192 Kbps :- 1minute. That's unbelievebale... > 2)AMD K-6II-500/64MB@128 Kbps :- 1 minute 50 sec. I know this is consistent.... > > I am using lame 3.70. -- Have you ever noticed that at trade shows Microsoft is always the one giving away stress balls? ---------------------------------------------- An alpha version of a web based tool to manage your subscription with this mailing list is at http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr
