Hi,

Kingsly John saw fit to inform me that: 
>
>On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
>
> |A 40 wire cable and a 80 wire cable doesnt look any different from
> |outside other than the fact that the 80 wire one would have the
> |connectors as red and blue. A 40 wire one has all ends black. By the way
>
>They look different if you look closely enough the you can see/feel that
>the wires are thinner!!

Yes. That's true. Today I connected the 80 wire cable with the thin wires
and blue connector to my hdd.

>
> |the kernel will default to UDMA33 unless you specify different. I
>
>No... it automagically detects it and enables UMDA/66.(at least it does on
>my machine)

In my case, now what happens is, I had compiled the dma support in the
kernel and I was not using hdparm -d1 option to enable dma. Now after
putting the other able I have to use -d1 option of hdparm ? How this
happened any ideas ?

But still even after putting append="idebus=66" in lilo.conf and lilo -v I
still get the old throughput which I used to get with the old udma33. Now
my bios also shows ATA66 when booting

dmesg shows the following :

----------------------------------------------------------------------
debian:~# dmesg | grep idebus
Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=debian-2.4.3 ro root=308 idebus=66
ide_setup: idebus=66
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
debian:~# hdparm /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 multcount    =  0 (off)
 I/O support  =  1 (32-bit)
 unmaskirq    =  0 (off)
 using_dma    =  1 (on)
 keepsettings =  0 (off)
 nowerr       =  0 (off)
 readonly     =  0 (off)
 readahead    =  1 (on)
 geometry     = 2096/255/63, sectors = 33683328, start = 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
debian:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.84 seconds = 69.57 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in 13.88 seconds =  4.61 MB/sec
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why still I get the same old poor throughputs ?

Thanks in advance.

Regards



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajesh Fowkar                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurtarkar Nagari,Bldg-C,T4,         http://rajesh.computers.webjump.com
Santacruz,Ponda-Goa-403401-INDIA    Powered By : Debian GNU/Linux with GRUB
                                                 Kernel 2.4.3 & Mutt 1.3.17i
                                                 IceWM 1.0.7  & KDE 2.1
"The expert at anything was once a beginner."  -Hayes 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------
The mailing list archives are available at
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/linux-india-help

Reply via email to