On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Sudhakar Chandra wrote:
|Kingsly John proclaimed:
|
|> srm.conf has been deprecated for quite some time now.. though the file
|> still exists all the config directives are now in httpd.conf
|>
|> [kingsly@utopia kingsly]$ grep srm.conf /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
|> # /usr/conf/srm.conf and then /usr/conf/access.conf
|> # srm.conf, and access.conf in that order. The latter two files are
|> #ResourceConfig conf/srm.conf
|> [kingsly@utopia kingsly]$
|>
|> so srm.conf is not even read!!
|
|In *your* case, you (or possibly the maker of your distribution) have
|commented out srm.conf from being read. Does not necessarily mean that
|srm.conf is deprecated. Debian unstable *still* uses srm.conf.
Is it not possible that debian still uses the good ole method ??
(personally I like the old configuration system... but time are a
changing! )
[kingsly@shrine tmp]$ wget
http://httpd.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/linux/apache_1.3.6-i586-whatever-linux2.tar.gz
[kingsly@shrine tmp]$ tar -zxf apache_1.3.6-i586-whatever-linux2.tar.gz
[kingsly@shrine tmp]$ tail -5 apache_1.3.6/conf/srm.conf-dist
#
# To avoid confusion, it is recommended that you put all of your
# Apache server directives into the httpd.conf file and leave this
# one essentially empty.
#
[kingsly@shrine tmp]$ tail -5 apache_1.3.6/conf/access.conf-dist
#
# To avoid confusion, it is recommended that you put all of your
# Apache server directives into the httpd.conf file and leave this
# one essentially empty.
#
[kingsly@shrine tmp]$
But you are right about it not being *deprecated*.... I used the word
because I couldn't think of any other.
This is still true....
[kingsly@shrine tmp]$ grep srm.conf apache_1.3.6/conf/httpd.conf-dist
# @@ServerRoot@@/conf/srm.conf and then @@ServerRoot@@/conf/access.conf
# srm.conf, and access.conf in that order. The latter two files are
#ResourceConfig conf/srm.conf
[kingsly@shrine tmp]$
But it doesn't mean anything because the srm.conf file is processed
anyways... the ResourceConfig directive only overrides the defaults.
And it's the same in case of apache-2.x too.
Kingsly
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
