Well , there is no Gateway , and no machine is configured as such.
I am confused by the entry that 10.10.1.15 (the client) shows ,
and do not know how to remove it.

 - Is that entry the cause of the problems ?

Thanks a million,
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Shyam

---------------------------------------------------------------------
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thu Dec 20 21:48:54 2001

Why do you have the default route with the gateway as 10.255.255.154?
Is that a real gateway?

-Naren

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Dear members ,
>
> The following is what the client (10.10.1.15) and the server
> (10.10.1.4) look like :
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] shyam]$ netstat -r
> Kernel IProuting table
> Destination  Gateway     Genmask  Flags  MSS  Window  irtt  Ifname
> 10.0.0.0     *           255.0.0.0    U    0       0     0    eth0
> 127.0.0.0    *           255.0.0.0    U    0       0     0    lo
>
> default  10.255.255.254  0.0.0.0     UG    0       0     0    eth0
> default  10.255.255.254  0.0.0.0     UG    0       0     0    eth0
>
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] shyam]$ netstat -r
> Kernel IProuting table
> Destination  Gateway     Genmask  Flags  MSS  Window  irtt  Ifname
> 10.0.0.0     *           255.0.0.0    U    0       0     0    eth0
> 127.0.0.0    *           255.0.0.0    U    0       0     0    lo
>
>
> Architecture :
>
> Win-Server------10.10.1.15-----10.10.1.2----Switch
>  |                                             |
> 10.10.1.13                                  10.10.1.3
>  |                                             |
> 10.10.1.12                                  10.10.1.4
>  |                                             |
> 10.10.1.11                                  10.10.1.7
>  |                                             |
> 10.10.1.10                                  10.10.1.6
>                                                |
> <<Door>> 10.10.1.9--10.10.1.8--10.10.1.5--------
>
> The WinServer (Win2K) is 10.10.1.1
> This network is basically "Star Topology"
> ie : All machines are connected ny cable to
> the switch.
> The reason why  10.10.1.7 and 10.10.1.5 appear in disorder
> are because of the whims of the person who had charge
> of installing the LAN (basically , a Windows network ,
> with mostly Win-Lin dual-boot machines).
>    Linux : Red Hat Linux (Guiness) 7.0 , kernel :  2.2.26-22
>
> As I said before , telnet , rsh,rlogin , ssh ,etc
> do work between 10.10.1.15 and 10.10.1.4 ,
> when they are on Linux.
>
>  One honorable member suggested that I look at
> /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny
> They were blank , and I also heard that by default ,
> /etc/hosts.deny denies access from other machines ,
> unless overridden by /etc/hosts.allow
> I added ALL : 10.10.1.4
> and     in.tcpd : ALL
> for the /etc/hosts.allow of 10.10.1.15
>
> and vice-versa ,
> so that at least now they start sending messages,
> rather than letting netstat -an|grep 9888
> tell me something like :
> ------- 10.10.1.15:1025 10.10.1.4:9888 ESTABLISHED
> and     ------------------------------ LISTEN
>


_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help

Reply via email to