As root remove the default route entry

man route


I'm not quite sure if that is a problem. But I would first run the
programs thru a debugger.

Then I would test with telnet (as I suggested in my earlier post)

-Naren

On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Well , there is no Gateway , and no machine is configured as such.
> I am confused by the entry that 10.10.1.15 (the client) shows ,
> and do not know how to remove it.
> 
>  - Is that entry the cause of the problems ?
> 
> Thanks a million,
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Shyam
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thu Dec 20 21:48:54 2001
> 
> Why do you have the default route with the gateway as 10.255.255.154?
> Is that a real gateway?
> 
> -Naren
> 
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > Dear members ,
> >
> > The following is what the client (10.10.1.15) and the server
> > (10.10.1.4) look like :
> > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] shyam]$ netstat -r
> > Kernel IProuting table
> > Destination  Gateway     Genmask  Flags  MSS  Window  irtt  Ifname
> > 10.0.0.0     *           255.0.0.0    U    0       0     0    eth0
> > 127.0.0.0    *           255.0.0.0    U    0       0     0    lo
> >
> > default  10.255.255.254  0.0.0.0     UG    0       0     0    eth0
> > default  10.255.255.254  0.0.0.0     UG    0       0     0    eth0
> >
> > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] shyam]$ netstat -r
> > Kernel IProuting table
> > Destination  Gateway     Genmask  Flags  MSS  Window  irtt  Ifname
> > 10.0.0.0     *           255.0.0.0    U    0       0     0    eth0
> > 127.0.0.0    *           255.0.0.0    U    0       0     0    lo
> >
> >
> > Architecture :
> >
> > Win-Server------10.10.1.15-----10.10.1.2----Switch
> >  |                                             |
> > 10.10.1.13                                  10.10.1.3
> >  |                                             |
> > 10.10.1.12                                  10.10.1.4
> >  |                                             |
> > 10.10.1.11                                  10.10.1.7
> >  |                                             |
> > 10.10.1.10                                  10.10.1.6
> >                                                |
> > <<Door>> 10.10.1.9--10.10.1.8--10.10.1.5--------
> >
> > The WinServer (Win2K) is 10.10.1.1
> > This network is basically "Star Topology"
> > ie : All machines are connected ny cable to
> > the switch.
> > The reason why  10.10.1.7 and 10.10.1.5 appear in disorder
> > are because of the whims of the person who had charge
> > of installing the LAN (basically , a Windows network ,
> > with mostly Win-Lin dual-boot machines).
> >    Linux : Red Hat Linux (Guiness) 7.0 , kernel :  2.2.26-22
> >
> > As I said before , telnet , rsh,rlogin , ssh ,etc
> > do work between 10.10.1.15 and 10.10.1.4 ,
> > when they are on Linux.
> >
> >  One honorable member suggested that I look at
> > /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny
> > They were blank , and I also heard that by default ,
> > /etc/hosts.deny denies access from other machines ,
> > unless overridden by /etc/hosts.allow
> > I added ALL : 10.10.1.4
> > and     in.tcpd : ALL
> > for the /etc/hosts.allow of 10.10.1.15
> >
> > and vice-versa ,
> > so that at least now they start sending messages,
> > rather than letting netstat -an|grep 9888
> > tell me something like :
> > ------- 10.10.1.15:1025 10.10.1.4:9888 ESTABLISHED
> > and     ------------------------------ LISTEN
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-india-help mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
> 



_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help

Reply via email to