Ambar Roy wrote:

> I won't recomend that u to do this! And never go in for raid 0, unless
> essential. It is a very bad idea for most workloads where u wud be having a
> remote server!


Umm so what exactly do you suggest I do ?? I have a server with data 
expanding in multiple directories and it is already 40GB in the current 
one. The upgraded server would have 2x36GB. I hope you are not 
suggesting I juggle around directories everyday - that was exactly what 
I am trying to avoid with the upgrade :).




Mithun


_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help

Reply via email to