Ambar Roy wrote:
> I won't recomend that u to do this! And never go in for raid 0, unless > essential. It is a very bad idea for most workloads where u wud be having a > remote server! Umm so what exactly do you suggest I do ?? I have a server with data expanding in multiple directories and it is already 40GB in the current one. The upgraded server would have 2x36GB. I hope you are not suggesting I juggle around directories everyday - that was exactly what I am trying to avoid with the upgrade :). Mithun _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help