On 21 Feb 2002 at 15:17, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > +++ Shridhar Daithankar [linux-india] <21/02/02 12:31 +0530>: > > 192.168.x.x is a range of 65536 addresses. Why don't you assign an ip to each > > machine. > For OUTBOUND connections? He has a /25 ... half a /24 (256 IPs) I guess. > However you can't go allotting all that to user's workstations.
Outbound connections can be NATed thr. single gateway. I don't know what this /25 /24 stuff is..I thought it's /16.. Of course alloting subnet makes sense of not all machines on lan. Say geographicaly distributed etc... > > And I really wonder, if you are using mutt, as your mail says, why you are > > not using any line warping.. > Grab my muttrc from http://www.hserus.net/muttrc.html - it should help > Bloody hell. Fortune must be psychic - picked up exactly the LOST tip I > wanted to point to from my muttrc. Should I comment on this? Make sure that some software vulnarability makes you down with fever one day.. I guess you are intercepting LAN traffic as well as kernel random number genrator thr. your sub concious...;-) Shridhar _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
