+++ Shridhar Daithankar [linux-india] <13/03/02 12:55 +0530>:
> On 13 Mar 2002 at 10:30, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > Or why not just use nt bootloader? Is there a problem?
> It sucks bad for few reasons.
> 1)It resides on a partition rather than partition boot sector making it
> live at
fair enough - but NT - and bootloader - are not all that bad compared to 9x.
I've seen patched nt server / workstation installs which ARE quite stable.
-srs
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian <----> mallet <at> efn dot org
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
[Linux One Stanza Tip] From : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
LOST #146 -**< Sub : Konquerer (kde) >**-
Do you know that konqueror can do much more than web browsing?
You can use the following URL schemes, and many more:
tar: - to browse tar.gz or tar.bz2 files
smb: - to browse Windows shares
man: & info: - to browse man and info pages
audiocd: - to browse audio CDs
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
