On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:30:04AM +0530, Anoop Johnson wrote: > Binand> I believe vim is also getting this client/server functionality > > Is that really needed for Vim?? Vim was never as "heavy" as [X]Emacs.
I think it is a good idea. Yank/Paste across vim sessions is one example. > >> * Multipart/HTML mails may be displayed inline in Gnus. (Unlike Mutt > >> where you have to call a browser like Lynx to read HTML mails). > > Binand> You mean mutt is bad because it does not include the > Binand> functionality of a web browser?? > > Displaying HTML in your application doesn't mean that you have to sit down > and write your browser code. Also, there are some better ways than just > spawning a browser. Yeah. Kparts is a good example. But I think these component models just take the Unix philosophy (do one thing at a time, and do it well) one step further. Anyway, I don't want to preach "do one thing at a time" to someone who is a follower of MDI - who has been singing praises of Microsoft for some time now. > interpreter called Emacs as your Editor/MUA/News-reader/IDE or whatever. > And that's why Emacs is called the "OTP" and has a place in > alt.religion.*. If you didn't understand what I said in my last post, you > never understood Emacs. Yeah. I never understood emacs, despite using it for more than 6 years now. Mea Culpa. Binand -- If you found this helpful, please take some time off to rate it: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=binand ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
