> Hi > it is well established that for a substantial period of time, the > ext2fs was the filesystem for the linux environment. however as a > modification to the ext2fs, the ext3fs offers 'journalisation'. now it > is obvious that in a server based environment, such facility is most > welcome as the reboot time after crash is very [and i mean really] > fast. question is on a desktop, stand-alone mac, what is the advantage > performance-wise as well as the resultant sum of data loss after > recovery ? And where are reiser-fs implemented ? And what is the > advantage there. > Any information will be appreciated
i don't think a desktop user should anyways bother with the extra overhead of ext3. A desktop user who switches of his comp. after working and otherwise also runs it off a UPS should not need the journalising capabilities of ext3. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET comprehensive development tool, built to increase your productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
