On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:11:01PM +0530, Philip S Tellis wrote: > Maybe they should first get an autoresponder that works correctly and > uses the Return-Path: header instead of the Reply-To: header.
That is of course, wrong. Autoresponders should use Reply-To: Return-Path: (also known as envelope sender address) is for the MTA use, to deliver bounces. It shouldn't be used at the user agent level at all. Did we have a valid reason for LIx lists to set the Reply-To: header back to the list? Binand -- If you found this helpful, please take some time off to rate it: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=binand ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating? Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holidays pass you by. T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/ _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
