On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:56:59PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> In light of the many redundant replies (such as the one above), I'd like to point 
> out a related excerpt from RFC 1855 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html):
> 
>     "In general, it's a good idea to at least check all your mail
>      subjects before responding to a message."
> 
> This is just a suggestion, but I think we could significantly reduce unnecessary list
> traffic by checking if a question has already been answered before replying with the
> same solution.  Understandably some mail servers will be lagged to the extent of
> making this issue unavoidable, but it would be nice to make an effort nonetheless.
>     
> What do you all think?

I think you are overreacting. In a list of more that two thousand
subscribers, certain simple questions would generate many redundant
replies; one has to learn to live with them.

Binand

-- 
Russian Roulette with Unix:
while :; do kill $RANDOM &> /dev/null && break || sleep 1; done


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help

Reply via email to