On 17/03/03 12:27 +0530, Rajesh wrote: > Hello, > > Here we have got the following senario. > > Our email server is 192.168.20.1 > > We have now got VSAT connection which has got a router 192.168.20.244 > (eth0). Now the requirement is the remote users are going to get the > ip's as 10.71.0.0 .... range. Those people should be able to access the > email server through the VSAT connection. Does the remote site really need a /16? > On my email server the router table shows the following : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# route > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > LANPJM-72-10.go * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 > 192.168.20.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 > 10.71.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 The netmask is /24 for this route. route add -net 10.71.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 dev eth0 What you have is: route add -net 10.71.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth0 which only covers 10.71.0.0-255
Devdas Bhagat ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
