On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:10:47PM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: >>>IIRC, kernel patches by RH would be bound by GPL. Else, they cannot >>>sell it. If I have understood (some aspects of) GPL, modifications >>>can be kept in-house and not released/sold.
The point is, no one is bound to publish the modified source on a public domain, because it is GPLed. GPL insist that one cannot sell the binary only version of the modified source. But that doesn't mean that the source should be available to *all*. I hope you get the point. Free software is not Free Lunch. Regards -- .''`. Dileep M. Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : http://www.kumarayil.net `. `'` `- Debian GNU/Linux - Choice of the Freedom Lovers ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
