On 12/03/04 19:34 +0530, K. Shantanu wrote: > * sanjay mehta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040312 19:18]: > > Hi, > > > > can anyone tell me which of the rbl servers I have to > > put in qmail rbllist? > How about, > bl.spamcop.net > relays.ordb.org > list.dsbl.org Corporate safe: cbl.abuseat.org sbl.spamhaus.org
Combined list: sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org A slightly non corporate safe list: dnsbl.sorbs.net A very useful one, if you are willing to live with punishing ISPs: l1.spews.dnsbl.sorbs.net. Again, possible false positives. Spamcop has a few tendencies to get a few more false positives than I like. > Ofcourse there are many more. These three just came to my mind. > > > Will adding more rbl entries in anyway affect the > > mailserver performance ? Latency due to each query. Run a caching nameserver, and whitelist frequently sending servers before checking. > Well, atleast till last year hyderabad VSNL was in some rbls .. making > me deny some perfectly legitimate mails. Its there now as well. Define legitimate mail please? As a server administrator, I would define legitimate mail as coming from a properly configured and administered mail server. An open relay is not. > I don't think this will have much overhead on server, since mails are > rejected at SMTP level itself. > You can also have your own rbl setup. Maybe Suresh can give more info > about all this. http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html Devdas Bhagat ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
