On 21/06/04 06:52 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 02:41:29AM +0530, Devdas Bhagat wrote:
> > Tiscali. BT. NTL World. Comcast. Cox. Chinanet. VSNL. Blueyonder.co.uk
> > Hinet.net 
> > 
> > < rant snipped >
> > 
> > Block on sight is a good idea.
> 
> Depends on just how concerned with false positives you are, and how large
> your userbase is.
Of course. But then again, I would say block the whole lot and allow
their legitimate outbound servers through (those which are not open
proxies/relays).

> 
> What works wonderfully well on a small mail site (personal domain, small
> office server) won't work when you make these decisions at a large ISP.
Yup.

> And for at least two or three of those IPs, it doesn't pay to believe all
> that you read in news.admin.net-abuse.email
I just tend to believe what my logs say. BY, BT, NTL and Tiscali are
virus sewers. Cox used to be one until last month. Comcast
is spammy. VSNL[1] is mostly spammy. VSNL leased circuits are not. 
Chinanet and Hinet are as bad as Comcast.

Roadrunner used to be evil with Swen. They appear to have cleaned up
since.

Devdas Bhagat
[1] The residential/dialup part of VSNL.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help

Reply via email to