On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:21:38 +0530 (IST), Ajay Pal Singh Atwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > As a matter of fact, it does suck. You want to see a modular, clean, > > scalable MTA? Look at Courier - www.courier-mta.org. It is backwardly > > compatible to Qmail, so you shouldn't have any trouble upgrading. > > > > Binand > > > > I have been using qmail for over last three years and may not take any > risk on courier, i have better things to take care of than patch an MTA > again and again.
Which was the precise reason that I went for Courier. I have never had to patch it - even for essential features, forget security. It has probably the cleanest record on security among all the MTAs currently in existence. > Qmail has proven itself as a robust and secure mta, i will wait till i can > be sure that courier can match qmail in security, features come last in my > wish list. Qmail also has a bunch of design problems - and that was the reason Sam went ahead and wrote Courier. Binand ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
