On Sunday 17 November 2013 12:38:43 [email protected] wrote: > > So it is a bad choice to use hid_output_raw_report (which calls > > usb_control_msg) in a ff_memless control function. I will just send a > > revert > > patch in some minutes. > > Rather than revert, can't we just replace the raw call with > 'hid_hw_request()' to send the data?
This device doesn't have any report and I had not the time to check how to
correctly generate the fields manually for the report/check why it doesn't
have any.
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
