> > > Instead of define each button in separate variable, make an array
> > > for storing all buttons. This change will help to add support for
> > > other types of PMIC and add support for probing with devicetree
> > > in the future.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31moboard.c | 9 ++++--
> > > drivers/input/misc/mc13783-pwrbutton.c | 56
> > +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > include/linux/mfd/mc13xxx.h | 28 +++++++++--------
> >
> > Are all the changes in these files entangled? If there is any way to
> > make them orthogonal, then all the better.
>
> Can you say the same thing in other words, I didn't understand a bit
> of your comment.
Do all of this changes in each of the files listed above depend on
each other?
> ...
> > > +struct mc13xxx_button {
> > > + u16 keycode;
> > > + unsigned int flags;
> > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_DBNC_0MS 0
> > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_DBNC_30MS 1
> > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_DBNC_150MS 2
> > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_DBNC_750MS 3
> > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_ENABLE (1 << 2)
> > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_POL_INVERT (1 << 3)
> > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_RESET_EN (1 << 4)
> > > +};
> > > +
> >
> > Please take the opportunity to remove this slab list of #defines from
> > the centre of the struct definition. Just above will be fine.
>
> I would like to make it in a separate patch for the whole header file later.
You may as well do it in this commit? Just add them outside of the
struct definition instead of inside.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
