Hello.
> > > > Instead of define each button in separate variable, make an array
> > > > for storing all buttons. This change will help to add support for
> > > > other types of PMIC and add support for probing with devicetree
> > > > in the future.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31moboard.c | 9 ++++--
> > > > drivers/input/misc/mc13783-pwrbutton.c | 56
> > > +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > include/linux/mfd/mc13xxx.h | 28 +++++++++--------
> > >
> > > Are all the changes in these files entangled? If there is any way to
> > > make them orthogonal, then all the better.
> >
> > Can you say the same thing in other words, I didn't understand a bit
> > of your comment.
>
> Do all of this changes in each of the files listed above depend on
> each other?
Yes, mc13783-pwrbutton.c & mc13xxx.h - changing the structure,
mach-mx31moboard.c - updating current users.
> > > > +struct mc13xxx_button {
> > > > + u16 keycode;
> > > > + unsigned int flags;
> > > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_DBNC_0MS 0
> > > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_DBNC_30MS 1
> > > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_DBNC_150MS 2
> > > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_DBNC_750MS 3
> > > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_ENABLE (1 << 2)
> > > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_POL_INVERT (1 << 3)
> > > > +#define MC13XXX_BUTTON_RESET_EN (1 << 4)
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Please take the opportunity to remove this slab list of #defines from
> > > the centre of the struct definition. Just above will be fine.
> >
> > I would like to make it in a separate patch for the whole header file later.
>
> You may as well do it in this commit? Just add them outside of the
> struct definition instead of inside.
OK, I'll do it in version 2, but I meant that I could change it for the other
structures in this header. As part of the input subsystem, I can not do that.
Thanks.
---