From: Barry Song <[email protected]> since the irq handler always return IRQ_HANDLED, it means this irq is not a shared IRQ at all. or at least, the SW is not self-consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <[email protected]> --- drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c index 4d13903..4d54744 100644 --- a/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/sirfsoc-onkey.c @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int sirfsoc_pwrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) pwrcdrv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); error = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pwrcdrv->irq, - sirfsoc_pwrc_isr, IRQF_SHARED, + sirfsoc_pwrc_isr, 0, "sirfsoc_pwrc_int", pwrcdrv); if (error) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to claim irq %d, error: %d\n", -- 1.7.5.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
