On 7/21/2025 4:21 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> The new name more closely fits the rest of the naming scheme in
> security/lsm_init.c. This patch also adds a trivial comment block to
> the top of the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com>
Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <ca...@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
> security/lsm_init.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
> index 7e736c20458a..c8af26a6ce14 100644
> --- a/security/lsm_init.c
> +++ b/security/lsm_init.c
> @@ -288,7 +288,10 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order,
> const char *origin)
> kfree(sep);
> }
>
> -static void __init ordered_lsm_init(void)
> +/**
> + * lsm_init_ordered - Initialize the ordered LSMs
> + */
> +static void __init lsm_init_ordered(void)
> {
> unsigned int first = 0;
> struct lsm_info **lsm;
> @@ -336,9 +339,6 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_init(void)
> init_debug("xattr slots = %d\n", blob_sizes.lbs_xattr_count);
> init_debug("bdev blob size = %d\n", blob_sizes.lbs_bdev);
>
> - /*
> - * Create any kmem_caches needed for blobs
> - */
> if (blob_sizes.lbs_file)
> lsm_file_cache = kmem_cache_create("lsm_file_cache",
> blob_sizes.lbs_file, 0,
> @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ int __init security_init(void)
> }
>
> /* Load LSMs in specified order. */
> - ordered_lsm_init();
> + lsm_init_ordered();
>
> return 0;
> }
