From: Roberto Sassu <[email protected]>

Commit 8e5d9f916a96 ("smack: deduplicate xattr setting in
smack_inode_init_security()") introduced xattr_dupval() to simplify setting
the xattrs to be provided by the SMACK LSM on inode creation, in the
smack_inode_init_security().

Unfortunately, moving lsm_get_xattr_slot() caused the SMACK64TRANSMUTE
xattr be added in the array of new xattrs before SMACK64. This causes the
HMAC of xattrs calculated by evm_init_hmac() for new files to diverge from
the one calculated by both evm_calc_hmac_or_hash() and evmctl.

evm_init_hmac() calculates the HMAC of the xattrs of new files based on the
order LSMs provide them, while evm_calc_hmac_or_hash() and evmctl calculate
the HMAC based on an ordered xattrs list.

Fix the issue by making evm_init_hmac() calculate the HMAC of new files
based on the ordered xattrs list too.

Fixes: 8e5d9f916a96 ("smack: deduplicate xattr setting in 
smack_inode_init_security()")
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <[email protected]>
---
 security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c 
b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
index a5e730ffda57..5a8cef45bacf 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
@@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ int evm_init_hmac(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr 
*xattrs,
 {
        struct shash_desc *desc;
        const struct xattr *xattr;
+       struct xattr_list *xattr_entry;
 
        desc = init_desc(EVM_XATTR_HMAC, HASH_ALGO_SHA1);
        if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
@@ -408,11 +409,16 @@ int evm_init_hmac(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr 
*xattrs,
                return PTR_ERR(desc);
        }
 
-       for (xattr = xattrs; xattr->name; xattr++) {
-               if (!evm_protected_xattr(xattr->name))
-                       continue;
+       list_for_each_entry_lockless(xattr_entry, &evm_config_xattrnames,
+                                    list) {
+               for (xattr = xattrs; xattr->name; xattr++) {
+                       if (strcmp(xattr_entry->name +
+                                  XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX_LEN, xattr->name) != 0)
+                               continue;
 
-               crypto_shash_update(desc, xattr->value, xattr->value_len);
+                       crypto_shash_update(desc, xattr->value,
+                                           xattr->value_len);
+               }
        }
 
        hmac_add_misc(desc, inode, EVM_XATTR_HMAC, hmac_val);
-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to