On 2/27/26 00:55, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Change the inode hash/lookup VFS API functions to accept u64 parameters
> instead of unsigned long for inode numbers and hash values. This is
> preparation for widening i_ino itself to u64, which will allow
> filesystems to store full 64-bit inode numbers on 32-bit architectures.
>
> Since unsigned long implicitly widens to u64 on all architectures, this
> change is backward-compatible with all existing callers.
>
> Functions updated:
> - hash(), find_inode_fast(), find_inode_by_ino_rcu(), test_inode_iunique()
> - __insert_inode_hash(), iget_locked(), iget5_locked(), iget5_locked_rcu()
> - ilookup(), ilookup5(), ilookup5_nowait()
> - find_inode_nowait(), find_inode_rcu()
> - inode_insert5(), insert_inode_locked4()
> - insert_inode_locked() (local variable)
> - dump_mapping() (local variable and format string)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
[...]
> -int insert_inode_locked4(struct inode *inode, unsigned long hashval,
> +int insert_inode_locked4(struct inode *inode, u64 hashval,
> int (*test)(struct inode *, void *), void *data)
> {
> struct inode *old;
> @@ -2642,7 +2642,7 @@ void init_special_inode(struct inode *inode, umode_t
> mode, dev_t rdev)
> break;
> default:
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (%o) for"
> - " inode %s:%lu\n", mode, inode->i_sb->s_id,
> + " inode %s:%llu\n", mode, inode->i_sb->s_id,
Hmmm. the type of ino in struct inode is changed in patch 2, not this patch. So
this feels incorrect. Why not just squash patch 2 in here ?
While at it, maybe you could change this to use pr_debug() too ?
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
