When recovering the measurement list after kexec(), the number of
violations is not recovered as well, causing a mismatch between the
number reported by the <securityfs>/ima/violations user interface and
the actual value. In addition, currently it is assumed that when
recovering an entry, this is a violation if the template data hash
read from the kexec buffer is an all-zero hash, which can actually be a
valid hash.

Verify that an all-zero hash corresponds to a violation and consequently
correctly recover the number of violations.

Reported-by: Roberto Sassu <[email protected]>
Closes: https://github.com/linux-integrity/linux/issues/13
Signed-off-by: Enrico Bravi <[email protected]>

---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c 
b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c
index 7034573fb41e..147f228ed246 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c
@@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ int ima_restore_measurement_list(loff_t size, void *buf)
        DECLARE_BITMAP(hdr_mask, HDR__LAST);
        unsigned long count = 0;
        int ret = 0;
+       int i;
 
        if (!buf || size < sizeof(*khdr))
                return 0;
@@ -515,15 +516,28 @@ int ima_restore_measurement_list(loff_t size, void *buf)
                if (ret < 0)
                        break;
 
-               if (memcmp(hdr[HDR_DIGEST].data, zero, sizeof(zero))) {
-                       ret = ima_calc_field_array_hash(
-                                               &entry->template_data[0],
+               ret = ima_calc_field_array_hash(&entry->template_data[0],
                                                entry);
-                       if (ret < 0) {
-                               pr_err("cannot calculate template digest\n");
-                               ret = -EINVAL;
-                               break;
+               if (ret < 0) {
+                       pr_err("cannot calculate template digest\n");
+                       ret = -EINVAL;
+                       break;
+               }
+
+               if (!memcmp(hdr[HDR_DIGEST].data, zero, sizeof(zero)) &&
+                   memcmp(entry->digests[ima_sha1_idx].digest, zero, 
sizeof(zero))) {
+                       for (i = 0; i < NR_BANKS(ima_tpm_chip) + 
ima_extra_slots; i++) {
+                               /* Unmapped TPM algorithms */
+                               if (!ima_algo_array[i].tfm) {
+                                       memset(entry->digests[i].digest, 0,
+                                              TPM_DIGEST_SIZE);
+                                       continue;
+                               }
+
+                               memset(entry->digests[i].digest, 0,
+                                      ima_algo_array[i].digest_size);
                        }
+                       atomic_long_inc(&ima_htable.violations);
                }
 
                entry->pcr = !ima_canonical_fmt ? *(u32 *)(hdr[HDR_PCR].data) :

base-commit: 8cd9520d35a6c38db6567e97dd93b1f11f185dc6
-- 
2.52.0


Reply via email to