On Sat, Oct 17, 2026 at 03:40:25AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2026 at 03:31:32AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Yeah so this needs a bit more redesign and while it is a possible > > way to address all these issues I don't believe it is best possible > > way imaginable to do something that lasts long-term. > > > > I don't want to go into concrete proposals because then I would have > > to really engineer the whole change while at it because I would > > likely try a number of approaches out. I.e. just a bit more effort > > and innovation please. > > I can give this: > > 1. Map the whole flow how we fluctuate values of durations. > 2. Think that if you were starting from zero how would you design a > unified and coherent flow. This includes all the callbacks and both TPM > 1.x and TPM 2.0. > 3. Redo the flow based on that premise. > > I.e., break more things with consideration and if it goes over the > top then we attenuate the changes where needed.
Thanks for the pointers Jarkko. Will work out a design and send a proposal. Surendran
