Hi Ronny,
Thanks for your response. I untarred a new copy of the linux-2.4.14
kernel and prepared to apply the patch by hand.
What's odd is it's already just as your link suggests:
>From ircomm_tty.c
/* Check if this is a "normal" ircomm device, or an irlpt device
*/
if (line < 0x10) {
self->service_type = IRCOMM_3_WIRE | IRCOMM_9_WIRE;
self->settings.service_type = IRCOMM_9_WIRE; /* 9 wire
as default */
self->settings.dce = IRCOMM_CTS | IRCOMM_CD; /* Default
line settings */
IRDA_DEBUG(2, __FUNCTION__ "(), IrCOMM device\n");
} else {
IRDA_DEBUG(2, __FUNCTION__ "(), IrLPT device\n");
self->service_type = IRCOMM_3_WIRE_RAW;
self->settings.service_type = IRCOMM_3_WIRE_RAW; /*
Default */
}
>From ircomm_tty_attach.c
if ((self->flags & ASYNC_CTS_FLOW) && ((self->settings.dce &
IRCOMM_CTS) == 0)) {
IRDA_DEBUG(0, __FUNCTION__ "(), waiting for CTS ...\n");
return;
} else {
So the patch seems to have already made it to the kernel, yet I still
see the same symptoms with the T39...
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Cameron
On 12 Nov 2001 17:49:17 +0100, Ronny Arild wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:46:46AM -0600, Cameron B. Prince wrote:
> |
> | I followed a long thread in the archives, and Andrea sums it all up
> | here:
> |
> | http://www.pasta.cs.uit.no/pipermail/linux-irda/2001-July/002946.html
>
> The complete patch needed in order to get the T39 to work is here:
>
> http://www.pasta.cs.uit.no/pipermail/linux-irda/2001-July/002954.html
>
> --
> Ronny H Arild - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
