> Regarding the ongoing work for a kernel patch which supports > (all?) the missing items to achieve full control of the RK USB > interface, I'm wandering...: > > - It's rather unlikly that the patch be accepted, given the > amount of code to be included in the general usb_storage module > and the small community of interested people.
The proposed patch just adds eject support, so it's possible it could still go in. I am pretty sure the sysfs patch would get the "never in a 1e6 years" response (though certainly anyone who wants to try can submit it). > - If the patch doesn't go into the official kernels, it is rather > unlikely that interested users will take the effort of patching > their kernels to get the added functionalities. True. > I think converting karma_helper/send_cmd into a "rkd" is just one > day work worth or less (and I am ready to start working on it ;). *shrug* My problem with the approach is if it adds a dependency to libkarma, how does lk find the daemon? Sounds like an awful lot of policy for a library, and I'm not crazy about having another install target. Do we really need the karma_helper stuff in libkarma proper? I think it is fine and useful as-is. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-karma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-karma-devel
