On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:45 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 10/27/2015 02:35 PM, ND Linux CI Server wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > This email is automatically generated by ND's Linux Patch Testing
> > framework
> > based on aiaiai. I have performed some automatic testing of a patch
> > (series)
> > you submitted to [email protected]
> >
> > The following contains output of any tests which failed to pass,
> > and might be
> > the result of developer error. The tests performed include but may
> > not be
> > limited to checkpatch.pl, bisection testing, compilation on a
> > default kernel
> > config, coccinelle scripts, cppcheck, and smatch.
> >
> > If you have received this email in error, or believe that aiaiai
> > has detected a
> > false positive, please email Jacob Keller <[email protected]
> > >.
>
> False positive.
>
> As long as the delay is at least 1ms (which is guaranteed), slightly
> longer
> delays (relative to the existing reset delay of 100ms) are not
> harmful.
>
> Use of usleep_range() would be unnecessary overkill for the purpose.
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
Feel free to ignore this then.
Regards,
JakeN�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
