On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:40:33 +0800
Geliang Tang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Simplify the code with list_first_entry_or_null().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/locks.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index 86c9467..d2ee8e3 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -1505,12 +1505,10 @@ void lease_get_mtime(struct inode *inode, struct 
> timespec *time)
>       ctx = smp_load_acquire(&inode->i_flctx);
>       if (ctx && !list_empty_careful(&ctx->flc_lease)) {
>               spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> -             if (!list_empty(&ctx->flc_lease)) {
> -                     fl = list_first_entry(&ctx->flc_lease,
> -                                             struct file_lock, fl_list);
> -                     if (fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK)
> -                             has_lease = true;
> -             }
> +             fl = list_first_entry_or_null(&ctx->flc_lease,
> +                                           struct file_lock, fl_list);
> +             if (fl && (fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK))
> +                     has_lease = true;
>               spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
>       }
>  

Looks fine. I'll merge it for v4.5.

Thanks!
-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to