On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:21:27 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Okay. But it does mean that the defeault idle period is 5 ticks > > > (50ms @ HZ=100) and not 5 ms > > correct. my reason is to scale with various HZ values. > > So for smaller HZ values we get longer disruption. That's well thought > out scaling. well it might be too long for embedded systems who uses 100HZ. Is there a better way to scale in sub tick level? My original thought was for smaller HZ value, I assume they care less about latency, so the idle injection period is proportional to what they set for HZ. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
