On 19/11/2015 14:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Marc Gonzalez wrote: >> On 19/11/2015 12:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >>> So yes, the alignment of the clocksource struct is not longer >>> relevant. The case where we access clocksource->max_cycles is when >>> CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING is enabled, which imposes worse performance >>> problems to timekeeping than the extra cacheline. >>> >>> So the simple solution for this issue is indeed the one liner below. >> >> It would make sense to also remove the comment emphasizing the >> alignment requirement. > > Indeed.
Thomas, Will you commit that patch yourself? Regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/