On Thu 03-12-15 22:16:55, Geliang Tang wrote:
> To make the intention clearer, use list_{first,next}_entry instead
> of list_entry.
Does this really help readability? This function simply uncharges the
given list of pages. Why cannot we simply use list_for_each_entry
instead...
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangt...@163.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 79a29d5..a6301ea 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5395,16 +5395,12 @@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
> unsigned long nr_file = 0;
> unsigned long nr_huge = 0;
> unsigned long pgpgout = 0;
> - struct list_head *next;
> struct page *page;
>
> - next = page_list->next;
> + page = list_first_entry(page_list, struct page, lru);
> do {
> unsigned int nr_pages = 1;
>
> - page = list_entry(next, struct page, lru);
> - next = page->lru.next;
> -
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page);
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page), page);
>
> @@ -5440,7 +5436,8 @@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
> page->mem_cgroup = NULL;
>
> pgpgout++;
> - } while (next != page_list);
> + } while (!list_is_last(&page->lru, page_list) &&
> + (page = list_next_entry(page, lru)));
>
> if (memcg)
> uncharge_batch(memcg, pgpgout, nr_anon, nr_file,
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
