* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:09:01AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > and then this code:
> >
> > > > cpumask_andnot(doms_cur[0], cpu_map, cpu_isolated_map);
> >
> > uses it without first clearing it.
> >
> > So is this another such bug, or am I missing something?
>
> It uses it as destination, it does a complete write of the mask.
ah, indeed! The cpumask primitive confused me.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
