On 04/12/2015 at 17:33:37 +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote :
> 
> 
> On 04/12/15 17:18, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >From: Ludovic Desroches <[email protected]>
> >
> >Move the selection of the pinctrl driver to SoC family level since we
> >have two pinctrl drivers. It is useless to select one which is not
> >compatible with the SoC.
> >
> >[abelloni: fixed pm.c when only sama2d2 is selected]
> >Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <[email protected]>
> >Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
> >Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>
> >---
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 6 +++++-
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c    | 7 ++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> [...]
> 
> >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> >index 80e277cfcc8b..01cbb17e6f6b 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> >@@ -41,8 +41,10 @@
> >   * implementation should be moved down into the pinctrl driver and get
> >   * called as part of the generic suspend/resume path.
> >   */
> >+#ifdef PINCTRL_AT91
> 
> Accidentally glanced at this patch when my mail client got hung at this
> patch :), I think you mean CONFIG_PINCTRL_AT91 here and later below.
> 


Raah, sure. Thanks!
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to