On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:07:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoem...@hpe.com> wrote: > > The ACPI spec speicifies that arguments "Revision ID" and > > "Function Index" to a _DSM are type "Integer." Type Integers > > are 64 bit quantities. > > > > The function evaluate_dsm specifies these types as simple "int" > > which are 32 bits. Correct type passed to acpi_evaluate_dsm > > and its callers and derived callers to pass correct type. > > > > acpi_check_dsm and acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed had similar issue > > and were corrected as well. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoem...@hpe.com> > > The changes look OK to me, but this is not ACPICA material. > > Please change the subject to something like "ACPI / utils: Fix > acpi_evaluate_dsm() argument type". > > Thanks, > Rafael
Will do. thanks. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jerry Hoemann Software Engineer Hewlett Packard Enterprise ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
