On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 02:49:26 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net> 
wrote:

> On Monday, December 28, 2015 01:24:13 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 02:12 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 03:34:42 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > Just a style fix, no functional changes.
> > > > 
> > > > To be folded to Andrew's patch.
> > > 
> > > What patch?
> > 
> > In linux-next from Andrew:
> > 
> > e39ece7 include-linux-propertyh-fix-build-issues-with-gcc-444-fix
> > 40bb8a1 include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4
> 
> Any pointers to the original patch submission(s)?

I think it was discussed in some followup to something else, I forget.

This:

From: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4

gcc-4.4.4 has problems with initialization of anonymous unions:

drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c:30: error: unknown field 'value' specified in 
initializer

work around this by crafting the initializers in a manner which the
compiler can handle.

Cc: Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
---

 include/linux/property.h |   16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff -puN 
include/linux/property.h~include-linux-propertyh-fix-build-issues-with-gcc-444 
include/linux/property.h
--- 
a/include/linux/property.h~include-linux-propertyh-fix-build-issues-with-gcc-444
+++ a/include/linux/property.h
@@ -175,12 +175,19 @@ struct property_entry {
        };
 };
 
+/*
+ * Note: the below four initializers for the anonymous union are carefully
+ * crafted to avoid gcc-4.4.4's problems with initialization of anon unions
+ * and structs.
+ */
+
 #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY(_name_, _type_, _val_)    \
 {                                                              \
        .name = _name_,                                         \
        .length = ARRAY_SIZE(_val_) * sizeof(_type_),           \
        .is_array = true,                                       \
-       .pointer._type_##_data = _val_,                         \
+       .is_string = false,                                     \
+       { .pointer = _type_##_data = _val_ } },                 \
 }
 
 #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8_ARRAY(_name_, _val_)                 \
@@ -198,14 +205,15 @@ struct property_entry {
        .length = ARRAY_SIZE(_val_) * sizeof(const char *),     \
        .is_array = true,                                       \
        .is_string = true,                                      \
-       .pointer.str = _val_,                                   \
+       { .pointer = { .str = _val_ } },                        \
 }
 
 #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER(_name_, _type_, _val_)  \
 {                                                      \
        .name = _name_,                                 \
        .length = sizeof(_type_),                       \
-       .value._type_##_data = _val_,                   \
+       .is_string = false,                             \
+       { .value = { ._type_##_data = _val_ } },        \
 }
 
 #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8(_name_, _val_)               \
@@ -222,7 +230,7 @@ struct property_entry {
        .name = _name_,                                 \
        .length = sizeof(_val_),                        \
        .is_string = true,                              \
-       .value.str = _val_,                             \
+       { .value = {.str = _val_} },                    \
 }
 
 #define PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL(_name_)            \
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to