Commit-ID:  093e5840ae76f1082633503964d035f40ed0216d
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/093e5840ae76f1082633503964d035f40ed0216d
Author:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:17:10 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:01:07 +0100

sched/core: Reset task's lockless wake-queues on fork()

In the following commit:

  7675104990ed ("sched: Implement lockless wake-queues")

we gained lockless wake-queues.

The -RT kernel managed to lockup itself with those. There could be multiple
attempts for task X to enqueue it for a wakeup _even_ if task X is already
running.

The reason is that task X could be runnable but not yet on CPU. The the
task performing the wakeup did not leave the CPU it could performe
multiple wakeups.

With the proper timming task X could be running and enqueued for a
wakeup. If this happens while X is performing a fork() then its its
child will have a !NULL `wake_q` member copied.

This is not a problem as long as the child task does not participate in
lockless wakeups :)

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7675104990ed ("sched: Implement lockless wake-queues")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/fork.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index fce002e..1155eac 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct 
task_struct *orig)
 #endif
        tsk->splice_pipe = NULL;
        tsk->task_frag.page = NULL;
+       tsk->wake_q.next = NULL;
 
        account_kernel_stack(ti, 1);
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to