On 02-02-16, 17:32, Saravana Kannan wrote: > But if we are expecting sched dvfs to come in, why make it worse for it. It > would be completely pointless to try and shoehorn sched dvfs to use > cpufreq_governor.c
We can move the common part to cpufreq core and not make sched-dvfs reuse cpufreq_governor.c -- viresh
