On 03-02-16, 10:51, Juri Lelli wrote: > I also think that sched-dvfs should not use cpufreq_governor.c. It is > useful boilerplate code for ondemand and conservative, as they share lot > of data structures and how they work, but it doesn't necessarily suit > everybody's needs, IMHO. > > OTOH, fixing the current issue in the best way we can come up with has > still value of course :).
Right. cpufreq_governor.c is more about the technique where we do load evaluation using deferred timers and workqueues, which isn't required for sched-dvfs. We can just move the common parts, like, governor_show/governor_store routines, and the new macros being added here. -- viresh
