On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > The show_gfp_flags() macro provides human-friendly printing of gfp flags in > tracepoints. However, it is somewhat out of date and missing several flags. > This patches fills in the missing flags, and distinguishes properly between > GFP_ATOMIC and __GFP_ATOMIC which were both translated to "GFP_ATOMIC". > More generally, all __GFP_X flags which were previously printed as GFP_X, are > now printed as __GFP_X, since ommiting the underscores results in output that > doesn't actually match the source code, and can only lead to confusion. Where > both variants are defined equal (e.g. _DMA and _DMA32), the variant without > underscores are preferred. > > Also add a note in gfp.h so hopefully future changes will be synced better. > > __GFP_MOVABLE is defined twice in include/linux/gfp.h with different comments. > Leave just the newer one, which was intended to replace the old one. > > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> > Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]> > Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]> > Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]> > Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> > Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[email protected]> > Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
