On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:07:58AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:54:26 +0000 > Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]> > > Will,
Hi Steve, > The patch looks good to me. Do you want to take it through your tree? > > It benefits mainline too as a rcu_read_lock() is more efficient than > rwlocks. Although I will say this is a slow path anyway. I was thinking that Catalin would queue it for 4.6 in the arm64 tree, since that's probably easiest in case any unlikely conflicts crop up. Will
