On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 13:56 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > +err:
>> > + if (i > 0)
>> > + for (; i >= 0; i--, con--)
>> > + typec_unregister_port(con->port);
>>
>> Perhaps
>>
>> while (--i >= 0) {
>> ...
>> }
>
> While we are at it. No we should not change the semantics
> of conditionals for the sake of appearance.
I'm sorry I didn't get you.
How this more or less standard pattern to clean up stuff on error path
does with conditional semantics?
I also noticed that this code might be factored out to helper which
will do same things (only number of loops is different) in both cases.
What did I miss?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
