The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332
("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering").Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebigge...@gmail.com> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index e979ec7..bfefc91 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled); * submitted by the CPU Frequency driver. * * Registers a CPU Frequency driver to this core code. This code - * returns zero on success, -EBUSY when another driver got here first + * returns zero on success, -EEXIST when another driver got here first * (and isn't unregistered in the meantime). * */ -- 2.7.1
