On Monday, February 22, 2016 10:54:46 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20-02-16, 21:50, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > The comment has been incorrect since commit 4dea5806d332
> > ("cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering").
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index e979ec7..bfefc91 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled);
> > * submitted by the CPU Frequency driver.
> > *
> > * Registers a CPU Frequency driver to this core code. This code
> > - * returns zero on success, -EBUSY when another driver got here first
> > + * returns zero on success, -EEXIST when another driver got here first
> > * (and isn't unregistered in the meantime).
> > *
> > */
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Queued up for 4.6, thanks!
