On Thu 25-02-16 13:36:11, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
[...]
> > +           /*
> > +            * We most definitely don't want callers attempting to
> > +            * allocate greater than order-1 page units with __GFP_NOFAIL.
> > +            */
> > +           WARN_ON_ONCE(unlikely(gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL) && (order > 1));
> 
> WARN_ON_ONCE already includes an unlikely in its definition:
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/asm-generic/bug.h#L109

OK, I just wanted to keep the condition untouched but you are right the
unlikely can be removed.

> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]>

Thanks!
---
>From 6ddc73c6d659224e996d1060974f5a14a1c5bf7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:29:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm: remove __GFP_NOFAIL is deprecated comment

647757197cd3 ("mm: clarify __GFP_NOFAIL deprecation status") was
incomplete and didn't remove the comment about __GFP_NOFAIL being
deprecated in buffered_rmqueue. Let's get rid of this leftover
but keep the WARN_ON_ONCE for order > 1 because we should really
discourage from using __GFP_NOFAIL with higher order allocations
because those are just too subtle.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 18 +++++-------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 1993894b4219..b5b7a7b0cad0 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2347,19 +2347,11 @@ struct page *buffered_rmqueue(struct zone 
*preferred_zone,
                list_del(&page->lru);
                pcp->count--;
        } else {
-               if (unlikely(gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL)) {
-                       /*
-                        * __GFP_NOFAIL is not to be used in new code.
-                        *
-                        * All __GFP_NOFAIL callers should be fixed so that they
-                        * properly detect and handle allocation failures.
-                        *
-                        * We most definitely don't want callers attempting to
-                        * allocate greater than order-1 page units with
-                        * __GFP_NOFAIL.
-                        */
-                       WARN_ON_ONCE(order > 1);
-               }
+               /*
+                * We most definitely don't want callers attempting to
+                * allocate greater than order-1 page units with __GFP_NOFAIL.
+                */
+               WARN_ON_ONCE((gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL) && (order > 1));
                spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
 
                page = NULL;
-- 
2.7.0


-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to