On Fri 26-02-16 08:46:25, Yang Shi wrote:
> The list_lock was moved outside the for loop by commit
> e8dfc30582995ae12454cda517b17d6294175b07 ("writeback: elevate queue_io()
> into wb_writeback())", however, the commit log says "No behavior change", so
> it sounds safe to have the list_lock acquired inside the for loop as it did
> before.
> Leave tracepoints outside the critical area since tracepoints already have
> preempt disabled.

The patch says what but it completely misses the why part.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <[email protected]>
> ---
> Tested with ltp on 8 cores Cortex-A57 machine.
> 
>  fs/fs-writeback.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 1f76d89..9b7b5f6 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1623,7 +1623,6 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>       work->older_than_this = &oldest_jif;
>  
>       blk_start_plug(&plug);
> -     spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
>       for (;;) {
>               /*
>                * Stop writeback when nr_pages has been consumed
> @@ -1661,15 +1660,19 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>                       oldest_jif = jiffies;
>  
>               trace_writeback_start(wb, work);
> +
> +             spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
>               if (list_empty(&wb->b_io))
>                       queue_io(wb, work);
>               if (work->sb)
>                       progress = writeback_sb_inodes(work->sb, wb, work);
>               else
>                       progress = __writeback_inodes_wb(wb, work);
> -             trace_writeback_written(wb, work);
>  
>               wb_update_bandwidth(wb, wb_start);
> +             spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
> +
> +             trace_writeback_written(wb, work);
>  
>               /*
>                * Did we write something? Try for more
> @@ -1693,15 +1696,14 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>                */
>               if (!list_empty(&wb->b_more_io))  {
>                       trace_writeback_wait(wb, work);
> +                     spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
>                       inode = wb_inode(wb->b_more_io.prev);
> -                     spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>                       spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
> +                     spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>                       /* This function drops i_lock... */
>                       inode_sleep_on_writeback(inode);
> -                     spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
>               }
>       }
> -     spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
>       blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>  
>       return nr_pages - work->nr_pages;
> -- 
> 2.0.2
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]";> [email protected] </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to