Hi Corey, Thanks for the review.
> Sure, this is a good idea. > > Acked-by: Corey Minyard <[email protected]> > > Note that nmi_panic() came in commit 1717f2096b5 (panic, x86: Fix > re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI) and then the regs field > was added in the commit you reference. Yes. So, I'll change the description to more proper one. > Do you want me to add this to the IPMI queue or do you have another > way to get this patch into the kernel? I don't have another way, and I don't know how cross-subsystem patch set should be handled. I think it would be better this patch set is managed by one person because both PATCH 2/3 and 3/3 depend on 1/3. Thanks, -- Hidehiro Kawai Hitachi, Ltd. Research & Development Group
