On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:12:34 +0800
Geliang Tang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Use kasprintf() instead of kmalloc() and snprintf().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>

Thanks, applied!

-- Steve

> ---
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index 2ece9f1..69aceae 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -1030,8 +1030,7 @@ static __init void ftrace_profile_tracefs(struct dentry 
> *d_tracer)
>       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>               stat = &per_cpu(ftrace_profile_stats, cpu);
>  
> -             /* allocate enough for function name + cpu number */
> -             name = kmalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL);
> +             name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "function%d", cpu);
>               if (!name) {
>                       /*
>                        * The files created are permanent, if something happens
> @@ -1043,7 +1042,6 @@ static __init void ftrace_profile_tracefs(struct dentry 
> *d_tracer)
>                       return;
>               }
>               stat->stat = function_stats;
> -             snprintf(name, 32, "function%d", cpu);
>               stat->stat.name = name;
>               ret = register_stat_tracer(&stat->stat);
>               if (ret) {

Reply via email to